Sada je: ned nov 10, 2024 8:43 pm.

Prijava

Korisničko ime:   Šifra:   Automatsko prijavljivanje  

Vremenska zona: UTC + 01:00




Započni novu temu Odgovori  [ 90 post(ov)a ]  Stranica Prethodna  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Sljedeća
Autor/ica Poruka
 Naslov: Re: Ekološka katastrofa u Meksiku
PostPostano: čet jun 17, 2010 10:10 pm 
Offline
Član foruma
Avatar

Pridružen/a: uto jan 02, 2007 3:28 pm
Postovi: 1206
Lokacija: 14° 26' I 45° 21' N - HUM
da se nisu odavno vec pripremali...
http://www.novilist.hr/Vijesti/Rijeka/b ... -spas.aspx

_________________
If the truth can be told so as to be understood it will be believed;
"Nase vjestine i navike, nasa znanja, nasi motivi, brojne emocije, razlicite osobine, pa i nasa citava LICNOST prvenstveno su rezultat ucenja."


Vrh
 Profil  
 
 Naslov: Re: Ekološka katastrofa u Meksiku
PostPostano: pet jun 18, 2010 1:29 am 
Offline
Član foruma

Pridružen/a: pet feb 08, 2008 10:55 pm
Postovi: 57
Makar to nekom izgledalo i glupo ali meni ovo sa ovom busotinom lici na namjeran scenari.
Ponasanje odgovornih i nadleznih ni u kom slucaju mi nisu u skladu trenutka pa nepristupacnost i kontrola informacija sve mi to lici na nesto sto je vec unaprijed planirano.
Nebi me iznenadilo da u skorije vrijeme odluce da Meksicki zaljev pretvore u naftni bazen i na taj nacin obezbijede bagatelnu exploataciju.
Jedino im jos ostaje da fizicki odvoje Meksicki zaljev od Atlanskog okeana a to i nije neki problem koji se nebi mogao izvesti izmedzu obala Floride i s druge strane obala Cube te odatle do obale Meksika sto i nije neka velika udaljenost i na taj nacin bi Meksicki zaljev postao bazen samo ovaj puta sa naftom umjesto vode.

Good lucky!

_________________
miki90


Vrh
 Profil  
 
 Naslov: Re: Ekološka katastrofa u Meksiku
PostPostano: pet jun 18, 2010 2:32 am 
Offline
Član foruma
Avatar

Pridružen/a: sri apr 28, 2010 2:44 pm
Postovi: 882
Citat:
Makar to nekom izgledalo i glupo ali meni ovo sa ovom busotinom lici na namjeran scenari.
Ponasanje odgovornih i nadleznih ni u kom slucaju mi nisu u skladu trenutka pa nepristupacnost i kontrola informacija sve mi to lici na nesto sto je vec unaprijed planirano.
Nebi me iznenadilo da u skorije vrijeme odluce da Meksicki zaljev pretvore u naftni bazen i na taj nacin obezbijede bagatelnu exploataciju.
Jedino im jos ostaje da fizicki odvoje Meksicki zaljev od Atlanskog okeana a to i nije neki problem koji se nebi mogao izvesti izmedzu obala Floride i s druge strane obala Cube te odatle do obale Meksika sto i nije neka velika udaljenost i na taj nacin bi Meksicki zaljev postao bazen samo ovaj puta sa naftom umjesto vode.

Good lucky!


Da, zbog profita su spremni na sve. Kao što Rahm Emmanuel kaže "nikad ne treba pustiti ozbiljnu krizu da propadne".

_________________
http://truthfrequencynews.com/


Vrh
 Profil  
 
 Naslov: Re: Ekološka katastrofa u Meksiku
PostPostano: pon jun 21, 2010 8:28 am 
Offline
Član foruma
Avatar

Pridružen/a: čet nov 01, 2007 3:49 pm
Postovi: 744
Lokacija: purgerland
Alzo dakle, evo teorije;

Populacija postaje svijesnija ili barem malo više informiranija.
Teorija o mrtvim dinosaurima i organskom kao porijeklu nafte je pred kolapsom.
Nafta se počinje vaditi gotovo svugdje i svakodnevno se nalaze novi izvori te novi načini izvlačenja iste.
Cijena nafte je umjetno kontrolirana, stvaranjem privida o kraju rezervi tzv "peek oil" koji je kao i Godot, nikako da dođe...
Kako održati cijenu nafte, kako smanjiti broj bušotina, kako održati populaciju u strahu, kako održati moć i status quo?

Jedna ekološka katastrofa bi dobro došla, zar ne?

_________________
Resident Agent provocateur & Conspiracy Theorist


Vrh
 Profil  
 
 Naslov: Re: Ekološka katastrofa u Meksiku
PostPostano: sri jun 23, 2010 3:30 am 
Offline
Član foruma
Avatar

Pridružen/a: sri apr 28, 2010 2:44 pm
Postovi: 882
dobra teorija metuzalem, evo još infoa koji je podržavaju;

slika

http://vodpod.com/watch/3881195-the-wat ... ightsblood

States Need To Launch Criminal Investigation Into BP, Federal Government’s Role In Oil Spill

The Watson Report: BP Oil Spill – Criminal Negligence or Deliberate Sabotage?

Paul Watson Breaks Down BP Oil Spill as A False Flage Event on Alex Jones Tv 24

Why Has Barack Obama Refused To Accept International Help To Clean Up The Oil Spill In The Gulf Of Mexico?

Experts: BP Lowballing Size of Leaking Oil Reservoir

Too Much Government in the Gulf

Mother Jones’ Corn Says BP Oil Spill Great for Democrats

_________________
http://truthfrequencynews.com/


Vrh
 Profil  
 
 Naslov: Re: Ekološka katastrofa u Meksiku
PostPostano: čet jun 24, 2010 4:24 am 
Offline
Član foruma
Avatar

Pridružen/a: sri apr 28, 2010 2:44 pm
Postovi: 882
BREAKING NEWS

Oil gushing at spill site after vent damaged

Live feeds from remotely operated vehicles (ROV)

_________________
http://truthfrequencynews.com/


Vrh
 Profil  
 
 Naslov: Re: Ekološka katastrofa u Meksiku
PostPostano: čet jun 24, 2010 5:57 am 
Offline
Član foruma
Avatar

Pridružen/a: sri apr 28, 2010 2:44 pm
Postovi: 882
BP Disaster: A few rough estimates

slika

These estimates are debatable, in part, because the quality of information coming from the spill response is so debatable. But here are some guesstimates:

At 100,000 bbl a day, there's 4.2 million gallons a day of oil entering the Gulf of Mexico. BP claims to have recovered a 1.1 million gallons of oil over the last 24 hours.

Let's be generous and assume that only 50,000 bbl/day of oil has been released, which is 2.1 million gallons of oil per day. And let's assume (very generously), that BP has been collecting 1.1 million gallons of oil per day since Day 1 (It certainly hasn't, and it probably still isn't, but let's assume). That means (64 days) x(1.1 million gallons/day) = 70 million gallons (about 6 Exxon Valdez Oil Spills) are floating around in the Gulf right now. Another 40 or 50 million gallons will be floating around by the time the relief wells are completed. The total equals about 10 Exxon Valdez Oil Spills.

Want to get really angry? Take a look at the satellite photos showing the gray/brown sludge spreading all over the Gulf, from Texas to Florida. Then recognize that a huge amount of the oil isn't even on the surface where it can be photographed, it's in the water column poisoning everything it comes into contact with. Add a couple million more gallons of toxic dispersant, just because things weren't bad enough already.

slika

The damage isn't going to be observed in oiled and dead animals. It's going to be observed in the animals that are never heard from again: turtles that die and sink to the bottom; turtles that are swept up in boom and burned alive; dolphins that die and sink into the abyss; fish poisoned by chemicals that destroy their gills, their ability to breath; animals that won't be counted--they just aren't there anymore when this is over. Like sea turtles that never come ashore to lay eggs again.

BP corrosion engineers on Alaska's North Slope have a saying: If we do our job well, that pipe will spring a leak at the very moment the last drop of oil flows through it. They call it run to fail mode. It isn't cutting costs, it's "finding efficiencies."

How about a saying for holding BP accountable for what it's done in the Gulf? How about: If we the people force our representative government to do the job right, BP will be bankrupt and close its doors just when the last victim is completely compensated. BP can pay financially for the damage being done to people's livelihoods. For what it's done to the environment, it deserves the corporate death penalty.

And how about 11 lives lost so a handful of mid-level managers can collect a bonus for "finding efficiencies."

In summary:

An (under)estimated 110+ million gallons of oil floating around or dispersed in the water column of the Gulf...

An unknown, and unknowable, loss of marine life...

An entire economy, and possibly an entire way of life, destroyed...

And 11 lives lost...

...for profit.

source

slika

slika

slika

Trešnja na vrh torte je da je nafta izgleda radioaktivna, imate jednom da pogađate zašto.

_________________
http://truthfrequencynews.com/


Vrh
 Profil  
 
 Naslov: Gulf Oli leak - novi 9/11
PostPostano: čet jun 24, 2010 6:45 am 
Offline
Član foruma
Avatar

Pridružen/a: sub sep 05, 2009 3:15 pm
Postovi: 55
Prije sam eksplozije primjećeno je 10-tak ljudi iz Blackwater.a za koje se sluti da su namjerno uzrokovali ovaj incident.

Čemu sve to?

Novi 9/11...prvi incident je poslužio za uvođenje novih zakona i oduzimanje prava...tako će i ovaj, sve u svrhu ostvarivanja nwo.a





First, let’s establish a few facts:

1.) Obama received large campaign contributions from BP.
2.) Obama received large campaign contributions from Goldman Sachs (Second only to The University of California in total campaign contributions).
3.) These companies, along with a slew of others, have been said to be holdings of the Rothschild Banking Family of England, as reported by the AmericaFreePress.net:

“Goldman Sachs is obviously an arm of their empire, whereas BP is among a host of companies in [the] Rothschild’s portfolio.”
Now that we’re here, let’s explore a bit further…

Is it not within the realm of possibility that the powerful family who holds BP is using it, and our government, as a “fall guy” creating an environmental crisis to fill the void left by the waning theory of global warming? What does a multi-billion dollar company matter when trillions are at stake, right? BP is merely a financial chess piece sacrificed as means to a much more lucrative end – checkmate: environmental law and treaties designed to take away individual property rights away forever and secure global governance – and trillions of dollars of global cash flow – for the richest family this world has ever seen.

http://seeker401.wordpress.com/2010/06/ ... lackwater/




Vrh
 Profil  
 
 Naslov: Re: Gulf Oli leak - novi 9/11
PostPostano: čet jun 24, 2010 7:34 am 
Offline
Član foruma
Avatar

Pridružen/a: uto nov 18, 2008 1:42 pm
Postovi: 79
Lokacija: Osijek
Hmm, zapravo ta katastrofa uopce nije toliko strasna, svi su se nesto nabrijali no medjutim ima puno gorih katastrofa.

Recimo ovo (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_War_oil_spill) je bila puno gora katastrofa:)


Vrh
 Profil  
 
 Naslov: Re: Gulf Oli leak - novi 9/11
PostPostano: čet jun 24, 2010 8:49 am 
Offline
Član foruma

Pridružen/a: uto mar 29, 2005 8:54 am
Postovi: 33
:(
http://www.rense.com/general91/d2se.htm

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=un8co1d4zb4


Vrh
 Profil  
 
 Naslov: Re: Ekološka katastrofa u Meksiku
PostPostano: čet jun 24, 2010 9:04 am 
Offline
Član foruma
Avatar

Pridružen/a: uto nov 11, 2008 11:36 am
Postovi: 738
Lokacija: Caerbannog
ako je istina u vezi radioaktivnosti, onda je nedavna web-bot analiza bila tocna:

Citat:
As part of the [government’s incompetence] sub set of linguistics there are
extensive internal cross links over to the Populace/USofA [military]
archetype. We had forecast that the [military] linguistics set would become
more [visible] over Summer of 2010, and perhaps result in a new [draft].
The archetype for [draft] is built of [national populace impact], and
[military] at its most basic level. These base linguistics are again getting
support, however in this Shape report, the interpretation will not be for a
[call for a draft]. It would appear that the base linguistics may be forecasting
the [impact on the national populace] of the USofA by the [military] as a
direct result of the [oil volcano] in the Gulf. The reasoning for this interpretation
is based on the idea that the use of [extreme military response]
{ed note: likely the ‘nuke it’ option in August} may well be manifesting. If
so, there will be a [fear] induced [diaspora] away from the Gulf states as the
[nuclear option] increases in probability. Then if it is [announced], there will
be further pressures on the [populace] to [leave/flee] the area. This [diaspora
(scattering of the peoples)] would definitively involve the [military] at many
levels as a method to attempt to [retain a national identity (hold the country
together)]. This would be an alternative interpretation that would also fulfill
the linguistics around which the [draft] forecast was built. Just to repeat for
clarity, the base linguistic sets that had led to the forecast of [draft] language
are still gaining supporting sets as modelspace is progressed over Summer,
2010. However, now the interpretation is for a different form of
manifestation for this language. We have some higher levels of confidence
for a [military participation] in a [large scale (if not nationally affecting)
evacuation] as the total number of cross links over to the Terra entity has
more than doubled since the last data gathering effort of a few months ago.



gledam na jubitu snimke naftne kise koja pada u okolici, sa ovakvim komentarima: you guys need to get the hell out while you can!!!!



Toxic Oil Spill Rains Warned Could Destroy North America

Reports are also coming from the United States that their government is secretly preparing to evacuate tens-of-millions of their citizens from their Gulf of Mexico States should the most dire of these scientific warnings start to come true.

LINK

webbot pogadja u sridu

_________________
(\___/)
(='. '=
(")_(") RUN AWAY! RUN AWAY!


Vrh
 Profil  
 
 Naslov: Re: Ekološka katastrofa u Meksiku
PostPostano: čet jun 24, 2010 10:20 pm 
Offline
Član foruma
Avatar

Pridružen/a: uto nov 27, 2007 11:07 pm
Postovi: 306
edit:

e vidim da je o naftnoj kiši već postano.
sori.


Zadnja izmjena: felix; čet jun 24, 2010 10:22 pm; ukupno mijenjano 1 put/a.

Vrh
 Profil  
 
 Naslov: Re: Ekološka katastrofa u Meksiku
PostPostano: čet jun 24, 2010 10:22 pm 
Offline
Član foruma
Avatar

Pridružen/a: uto nov 04, 2008 10:30 pm
Postovi: 604
Lokacija: Again in Đakovo
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE65L6IA20100622

_________________
"Sve je jasno,samo sam ja zamagljen"- Lao Tse


Vrh
 Profil  
 
 Naslov: Re: Ekološka katastrofa u Meksiku
PostPostano: čet jun 24, 2010 10:36 pm 
Offline
Član foruma
Avatar

Pridružen/a: sub apr 17, 2010 5:19 pm
Postovi: 398
Lokacija: sada i ovdje
Velika ekološka katastrofa u SAD-u + veliki nemiri i prosvjedi ljudi, građanski nemiri i mnogo toga drugoga što ide pod ruku aktiviranju vanrednog stanja i FEMA-e? Možda će da FEMA stupi na snagu i da se obustavi Ustav i građanska prava uskoro i onda tko zna šta bi sljedilo iza toga, sve mi nešto smrdi na to... :-k

A opet, tko zna... uglavnom smrdi :mrgreen:

_________________
-Evo moje tajne. Vrlo je jednostavna. Dobro se vidi samo srcem.Bitno je očima nevidljivo...
-Vrijeme što si ga posvetio svojoj ruži čini tu ružu toliko dragocjenom...
-Ljudi su zaboravili tu istinu, ali ti je ne smiješ zaboraviti. Zauvijek si odgovoran za ono što si pripitomio. Odgovoran si za svoju ružu..


Vrh
 Profil  
 
 Naslov: Re: Ekološka katastrofa u Meksiku
PostPostano: čet jun 24, 2010 10:53 pm 
Offline
Član foruma
Avatar

Pridružen/a: sri apr 28, 2010 2:44 pm
Postovi: 882
Ma da, svima je već jasno da se radi o sabotaži, koju je izvela tajna vlada, dok je FEMA njen spoljni vid koja sada preuzima daljnu igru, do potpune uspostave NWO.

Što je radio Blackwater tim na bušotini pred njenu eksploziju? Aloooo, može li biti očiglednije.

_________________
http://truthfrequencynews.com/


Vrh
 Profil  
 
 Naslov: Re: Ekološka katastrofa u Meksiku
PostPostano: pet jun 25, 2010 12:09 pm 
Offline
Član foruma
Avatar

Pridružen/a: sub sep 05, 2009 3:15 pm
Postovi: 55
"Knowing" movie and the Oil Rig Explosion in the Gulf of Mexico 2010

Slučajnost?




Vrh
 Profil  
 
 Naslov: Re: Gulf Oli leak - novi 9/11
PostPostano: sub jun 26, 2010 12:06 pm 
Offline
Član foruma

Pridružen/a: pet jan 26, 2007 9:50 pm
Postovi: 545
Lokacija: Split
Hrvoj je napisao/la:
Hmm, zapravo ta katastrofa uopce nije toliko strasna, svi su se nesto nabrijali no medjutim ima puno gorih katastrofa.

Recimo ovo (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_War_oil_spill) je bila puno gora katastrofa:)


Misliš ?

Prvo Perzijski zaljev je zatvoreni eko sistem.

Drugo tamo nije nafta istjecala s dna mora nego su Iračani otvorili cijevovode put moru da bi zaustavili američke marince pri iskrcavanju na obalu.

To su ti te prve dvije bitne stavke.

Treča stavka ti je šta obala perzijskog zaljeva nije gusto naseljena nego je uglavnom riječ o pustinjama okolo. Izuzev možda samog Kuvajta. Dakle nemožeš ih uopće uspoređivat s nekom Floridom , Louisianom i slićno. Ok , nema veze al bitno za napomenit ipak.

Ovo ti je lista najgorih ekoloških katastrofa :

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oil_spills ... oil_spills

Najveća ekološka katastrofa bila je na kopnu i to u zabiti Kalifornije i to 1910 g. Dakle nije more.

Druga ti je ta u perzijskom zaljevu i ne zna se koliko je nafte izašlo al neka je deset miljona barela.

Treča ti je 1979 g. isto u Meksičkom zaljevu i trajala je devet mijeseci i scurilo im je nafte koliko već sada u ova dva mjeseca je iscurilo iz ove katastrofe zvane Deepwater horizon.

Budući da nisu u međuvremenu izmislili ništa pametno pitanje je oće li i njima tribat devet mijeseci dok to zaustave.

I sad im dolazi tropska oluja.

S metodom kupola uspijevaju sanirat pola nafte koja istiće. A istiće 60,000 barela dnevno. Tu kupolu nisu stavili odma nego možda tek nekih mjesec dana nakon katastrofe. Znači u prv mijesec dana isteklo im je blizu dva miljona barela. U drugom nešto manje al sve skupa je već tri miljuna barela. I još nemaju blage veze kako će to zaustavit. Sad kad dođe tropska oluja opet moraju micat brodove , dakle opet će isticat 60,000 barela dnevno. Dok se oni opet namiste triba vrimena. Bla bla bla oni to neće zatvorit bar još dva miseca i kako god okreneš to je već šest miljona barela. Dakle ta katastrofa je već sada treća po redu. A i pitanje je kad će je zatvorit jer oni u međuvremenu nisu uopće razvijali tehnike kako da ovo riješe brzo. Ako im je za onu katastrofu prije 31 godinu u meksičkom zaljevu tribalo devet mijeseci i ako im za ovu bude tribalo samo šest onda će ti ovo bit ; tri miljuna koje već isteklo , pa računaj još tri il dva u iduća dva mijeseca i svaka dva mijeseca dodaji po još dva miljuna barela sirove nafte pa sad računaj.

_________________
Činjenica sama za sebe nikada nije važna bez dobre procjene i jasne povezanosti s drugim činjenicama.


Vrh
 Profil  
 
 Naslov: Re: Ekološka katastrofa u Meksiku
PostPostano: sub jun 26, 2010 3:40 pm 
Offline
Član foruma

Pridružen/a: pon dec 17, 2007 10:55 pm
Postovi: 73
Sto veca katastrofa to vece posledice,sto vece posledice manje stanovnika ,sve ide ka planu zlatne milijarde,mislim da je to sasvim jasno kao jedan od planova ovakvih desavanja.Namjerno izazvan incident za mnogo planova od kojih je i jedan ovde naveden.Ako imaju masine koje bez vode odrzavaju biljke u pustinji ,onda je logicno da zele da mi zavisimo od njihovih masina a ne od same prirode

_________________
ako laze koza ne laze rog


Vrh
 Profil  
 
 Naslov: Re: Ekološka katastrofa u Meksiku
PostPostano: pon jun 28, 2010 11:57 am 
Offline
Član foruma

Pridružen/a: uto mar 29, 2005 8:54 am
Postovi: 33
mozda malo off topic al eto mozda stage 2 u manipulaciji i mozda ima veze sa "nezgodom" BP-a...

kao kraljica majka ce odsupiti s trona
http://www.fourwinds10.com/siterun_data ... 1277010855

(N)ovom (anti)Kristu
http://www.youtube.com/user/MichelleNye

moj prijatelj google :D kaze u nekom od clanaka da su lika navodno vec par puta pokusali ubiti, a i sam lik prica o silini brojcica preokretanim u svim smjerovima

ma ukratko bas me zanima dal ce kraljica majka odstupit kako kaze u onom clanku :D, jos sumljivije kak se tih tonu filmica na njihovom youtube kanalu odrzalo ovih par godina ako im je lik pajn in d ass :D


Vrh
 Profil  
 
 Naslov: Re: Ekološka katastrofa u Meksiku
PostPostano: sri jun 30, 2010 12:58 am 
Offline
Član foruma
Avatar

Pridružen/a: sri jan 09, 2008 5:56 pm
Postovi: 205
The David Icke Newsletter, June 27th 2010

'AND THE SEA SHALL TURN TO BLOOD' ...

... A 'BIBLICAL' CATASTROPHE THAT WILL AFFECT US ALL

THE 'SPILL' (UNCONTROLLED GUSH) WILL DEVASTATE AMERICA?

YES, BUT THAT'S THE IDEA

Hello all ...

The potential magnitude of what is unfolding in the Gulf of Mexico simply cannot be overstated. It is far, far worse than is being admitted and what we are allowed to see is catastrophic enough.

When a major event happens I like to watch and wait to see what information comes to light before jumping in with 'it's this' or 'it's that'. What appears to be one thing at the start can become something quite different a few days or weeks later.

But I have long seen more than enough to shake my head at claims that this was just an 'accident' or 'incompetence'.

Beware cover stories of 'incompetence', as with 'incompetent bureaucrats', because they are so often a veil for cold calculation. The Gulf of Mexico disaster didn't just happen, it was made to happen.



Mother Jones magazine reported:

'Tony Buzbee, a lawyer representing 15 rig workers and dozens of shrimpers, seafood restaurants, and dock workers, says he has obtained a three-page signed statement from a crew member on the boat that rescued the burning rig's workers.

The sailor, who Buzbee refuses to name for fear of costing him his job, was on the ship's bridge when Deepwater Horizon installation manager Jimmy Harrell, a top employee of rig owner Transocean, was speaking with someone in Houston via satellite phone.

Buzbee told Mother Jones that, according to this witness account, Harrell was screaming, "Are you fucking happy? Are you fucking happy? The rig's on fire! I told you this was gonna happen.'

Yes, and nothing was done because it was meant to happen.

Readers of my books and website will be well acquainted with the name, Halliburton, the Illuminati-to-its-fingertips corporation once headed by the truly evil Dick Cheney, the real power in the White House during the Boy Bush administration that gave us 9/11, the 'war on terror' and the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq.

The company headed by a key player behind the war on Iraq has since been awarded a stream of no bid government contracts in the country that have transferred staggering amounts of taxpayer money into the pig trough infested by Halliburton executives and shareholders.

Lawsuits claim that the explosion on the Deepwater Horizon rig, 52 miles south-east of the Louisiana port of Venice on April 20th, was caused because Halliburton workers improperly capped the well - a process known as cementing.

Anything - anything - involving or connected to Halliburton is ultimately controlled and dictated by the Illuminati cabal orchestrated by the House of Rothschild and its associated families. They own Halliburton, lock, stock and millions of barrels.

Just eight days before the Gulf blow-out, Halliburton also announced that it had agreed to buy Boots & Coots for $240.4 million. Who are Boots & Coots?

The world's largest oil-spill clean-up company which also deals with oil and gas well fires and blowouts.

What an incredibly fortunate coincidence. What a slice of luck.

The same, too, for another Rothschild-controlled cesspit of evil and corruption, Goldman Sachs, the 'investment bank' that gave us the mortgage debt crisis and the economic collapse of Greece.

Goldman Sachs sold 44 per cent of its holdings in BP, a total of 4,680,822 shares worth the best part of $300 million, in the weeks before the Gulf disaster that sent BP shares plummeting, and Tony Hayward, BP's disgraceful chief executive, is reported to have sold his £1.4 million shares in BP a month before the explosion. The profit allowed him to pay off the mortgage on his mansion. How nice.

As with the pre-9/11 'put options' (bets) on the stocks of American airlines falling, so we have gathering evidence that some people knew what was coming in the Gulf of Mexico from an oil rig operated by one of the biggest Illuminati companies on the planet - British Petroleum.

Merely drilling where BP did, with the known pressures from within the earth, was asking for trouble - literally from the inner cabal's point of view.

But what's the deal? How does an oil-poisoned ocean and devastated coastal communities (and potentially others far inland and around the world) benefit the Illuminati cabal and their agenda for total global control?

Oh, in so many ways.

Firstly, we need to appreciate the almost unimaginable scale of what is happening - facts that BP and the Obama-fronted American government are desperate to keep from us.

Recent reports have claimed to quote the opinions of scientists who are too fearful to be publicly named because of the consequences for their lives and careers.

They estimate the release of oil from under the Earth's crust at between 80,000 and 100,000 barrels a day. That is 4.2 million gallons or 15.9 million litres a day potentially pouring into the Gulf.

This aligns with a leaked internal BP document that says that in a 'worst-case scenario' up to 100,000 barrels a day could be released into the ocean.

The scientists were quoted as saying that the 'sandblasting' of the oil, toxic gases, rocks and sand will be continually making a bigger hole for the oil and gas to escape. In other words, the situation is getting worse not better and it is already a catastrophe of immense proportions for those immediately affected - a number growing rapidly by the day.

The scientists predicted that the drill hole will expand beneath the wellhead and so weaken the area on which the wellhead stands until it is pushed off the hole to allow the oil to flow with no restrictions at all.

Should that happen the consequences are unthinkable.

The scientists said that billions of barrels of oil will be released before the pressure in the enormous cavity five miles below the seabed calms and finds balance and then water would pour into the cavity to replace the oil.

They said that the temperature at that depth, some 400 degrees, will turn the water to steam creating a pressure that will lift the ocean floor. They estimate that this will create a tsunami of between 20 to 80 feet, or even higher, that will bring the poisoned ocean ashore to leave great tracts of land uninhabitable and without life.

American investigative journalist, Wayne Madsen, writes that satellite imagery withheld by the Obama administration shows that 'under the gaping chasm spewing oil at an ever-alarming rate is a cavern estimated to be around the size of Mount Everest'. This information, he says, has been given an almost national security-level classification to keep it from the public.

Now, we have heard many doomsday scenarios before in many circumstances that have not manifested, but even if such shocking predictions do not happen on that staggering scale there is no question that the world changed on April 20th 2010 when the Deepwater Horizon rig exploded.

Just a look at the map of the Gulf region reveals the potential effect on enormous numbers of people in Mexico, the Caribbean and the southern states of America with so many living on or close to the coastline ...

But the scale and potential of what we are seeing goes way beyond even the Gulf. The scientists I mentioned earlier say that the oil has now reached the Gulf Stream, with a current at least four times stronger than in the Gulf of Mexico itself, and this could help to direct the oil all over the world in the next 18 months.

It is the Gulf Stream that keeps the United Kingdom and parts of Europe much warmer than they would otherwise be at their latitude, but it will also act as a oceanic conveyor belt delivering the oil from the Gulf Mexico across the Atlantic.

The toxic oil and gas are being added to by the lethal 'dispersant' used by BP to (theoretically, for public consumption only), 'disperse the oil'. They are using Corexit 9500 and Corexit 9527A which are so toxic they have been banned in Europe, although Europe is likely to get them anyway via the Gulf Stream.

Corexit is manufactured by a corporation called Nalco, once part of ExxonMobil, and the current leadership includes executives from Exxon and BP. The European Union Times said of Corexit:

'A dire report prepared for President Medvedev by Russia's Ministry of Natural Resources is warning today that the British Petroleum (BP) oil and gas leak in the Gulf of Mexico is about to become the worst environmental catastrophe in all of human history threatening the entire eastern half of the North American continent with "total destruction" ...

... Russian scientists are basing their apocalyptic destruction assessment due to BP's use of millions of gallons of the chemical dispersal agent known as Corexit 9500 which is being pumped directly into the leak of this wellhead over a mile under the Gulf of Mexico waters and designed, this report says, to keep hidden from the American public the full, and tragic, extent of this leak that is now estimated to be over 2.9 million gallons a day.'

You might think at first hearing that it is blatantly crazy to use Corexit when there are some 12 other less toxic and more effective dispersants approved by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Two of those on the EPA list 'were found to be 100 percent effective on Gulf of Mexico crude, while the two Corexit products rated 56 percent and 63 percent effective'.

Well, yes, it is crazy, these people are crazy, but there is method in their madness, as I'll explain.


Killing the sea to 'save' the sea.

Corexit also causes the oil to drop below the surface so giving a false impression of how much oil is in the water.

Environmental engineer Joe Taylor has publicly warned BP to stop using Corexit immediately or everything in the sea is going to die. It is worth watching this short report on his findings before we move on, because we are getting to the prime question - why is BP doing everything it can to cause maximum destruction

The key words spoken by Joe Taylor were when he said that if he knew the information about the effect of Corexit then so did BP - 'They have a lot of chemists who are a lot smarter than I am, and they know this.'

Why would BP be knowingly causing as much environmental devastation as possible? The answer to this question is the same as the answer to these:

Why was the booming operation supposed to protect the beaches from the oil so pathetic and 'inept', as exposed here by an expert ... BP Fails Booming School 101?

Why is the BP 'clean-up' operation so disorganised, unmotivated and basically non-existent that BP employees are working for little more than two hours a day on beach cleaning, as exposed here in The Short Film BP Doesn't Want You To See ...?

The answer to all those questions and so many more is this: we are looking at an environmental 9/11 that was made to happen and those behind this carnage want it to be as extreme as possible to get maximum impact in terms of their goals of control and chaos.

Yes, BP is a 100% Illuminati company now facing fantastic costs and public condemnation, but all these corporations are just vehicles and thus expendable as necessary to the core agenda.


A vacuous, ludicrous and mendacious man called Bob Dudley, the BP managing director, said from the comfort and distance of Washington DC that 'for BP, our intent is to restore the Gulf the way it was before it happened.'

Excuse me a moment ...

AAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!

Thank-you.

Meanwhile, back here on Planet Earth, life as they have known it is already over for the coastal communities of the Gulf region with the tourist and fishing industries devastated or destroyed. People are now being forced to earn a livelihood working on 'clean-ups' for the same BP that has wreaked this havoc on their lives and families.

What's more, they are told by this merciless corporation that they must work amid shocking levels of toxicity without respirators because they don't want to 'alarm the public' by seeing such pictures - the same reason why BP has basically introduced its own martial law in the region to stop the full and horrific extent of the disaster and its global potential coming to light.

The health consequences for those 'clean-up' workers already exposed to this deeply toxic environment without protection will already be horrific, as we shall see. But BP couldn't give a shit - just as the US government and the New York authorities couldn't give a shit about the rescue workers on the toxic World Trade Center site after 9/11.

Already, even the (pathetic) mainstream media has reported that 70 people in Louisiana have been admitted to hospital with symptoms of toxin poisoning. Many beaches have been closed because of toxins in the air and water and people are reporting breathing problems and skin rashes and lesions.

One report said that crops as far north as North Carolina have been damaged by toxic rain, while oil has been falling in the rain near the Louisiana coast.

This is only the beginning, too, as the oil continues to gush in ever-greater amounts to be met by the lethal Corexit in ever-greater amounts, and that whole deadly toxic cocktail is going to fall as rain on communities far from the coast.

Add to that the hurricanes, tidal surges and other weather phenomena and you can understand why those nameless scientists are writing off land up to 200 miles from the shore as becoming too toxic to support life, let alone a human society. See the story about Nigeria at the end of this article for some of the consequences that oil pollution can bring.

Two other effects of so much oil in the Gulf of Mexico could be to heat up the sea, so causing more hurricanes and super-storms, and making the process of producing rain from seawater less efficient, so affecting rainfall on the land.

The major target of this engineered horror is America and its economy - as I have been saying for years they are seeking to destroy the United States militarily and financially to bring this 'superpower' to its knees so it can be absorbed into a world government dictatorship via a North American Union.

BP has said that massive quantities of methane are leaking with the oil, along with large mounts of lethally toxic hydrogen sulfide, benzene and methylene chloride. This has the potential to trigger mass evacuations.

John Kessler, oceanography professor at Texas A&M University, discovered on a ten-day research expedition what he called 'astonishingly high' levels of methane within five miles of the stricken rig - 'an incredible amount' - and maybe as much as a million times greater than normal.


It is very sobering to look again at the towns and cities of the Gulf coast given a report by investigative journalist, Wayne Madson, that quotes 'sources' inside the US government, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the US Army Corps of Engineers as predicting a 'dead zone' within 200 miles of the rig caused by a combination of methane and toxic rain containing Corexit.


Madsen says:

'Plans are being put in place for the mandatory evacuation of New Orleans, Baton Rouge, Mandeville, Hammond, Houma, Belle Chase, Chalmette, Slidell, Biloxi, Gulfport, Pensacola, Hattiesburg, Mobile, Bay Minette, Fort Walton Beach, Panama City, Crestview, and Pascagoula.'

Imagine evacuating that many people and maybe more of the tens of millions of people who live on or within 200 miles of the Gulf coast, but then that would be just the scale of disaster and compulsion that would allow FEMA, a major asset of the Control System as my books and others have detailed, to impose its long-planned martial law on enormous numbers of people.

FEMA and the military have been preparing for this for years with exercises for just such a situation involving oil pollution, but all records of this were expunged from FEMA-related websites in the weeks before the Deepwater Horizon explosion.

Anything that affects America on such a scale would have a knock-on effect economically across the world - another bonus for the cabal which is seeking to create maximum chaos on every front to instigate the global problems to which it will offer its global solutions - a world political and military dictatorship.

Watch China like a hawk, or rather like a vulture, as it begins to circle America waiting to seize its carcass as soon as it thinks it is sufficiently wounded.

While I was writing this article, I remembered that one of the 'messages' I was given through the first psychic I saw in 1990 said this:

'Taking oil from the seabed is destabilising the inner earth. The centre of the earth will move and the poles will change. The sea spirits will rise and stop men taking oil. The sea will reclaim the land and humans will see that they cannot do these terrible things. They cannot abuse the elements. They have to be treated with respect.'

We are certainly going to see increasing signs of geological instability in these 'end times' as one era ends and another begins. It is a time to be strong and strap in for a bumpy ride for a while.

There are so many levels to all this and so much more to know about what is happening. On one level the Illuminati families pursue their agenda, as with this oil disaster, but on another there are other events unfolding and what seems to be happening on one level looks very different when viewed from another.

It is also interesting that many prophecies in different cultures include a theme of the sea turning to blood which, to be fair, is what the polluted sea of Gulf now looks like.



The Biblical Book of Revelation (8:8 and 8:9) says:

'And the second angel sounded, and as it were a great mountain burning with fire was cast into the sea: and the third part of the sea became blood;

And the third part of the creatures which were in the sea, and had life, died; and the third part of the ships were destroyed.'

I was talking a couple of days ago to the great Zulu high shaman, Credo Mutwa, and he said that the sea turning to blood during the run up to the 'end of the world' is a theme in his culture, too. He also said that South African sangomas (shamans) are having visions and dreams about the rain falling as blood and 'large lumps of blood rolling in the shore'.

The prophecies of the Hopi people in Arizona speak of the sea turning black as a sign that the old age is ending and new one about to begin. It says:

'This is the seventh sign, You will hear of the sea turning black, and many living things dying because of it.'


This is the theme of so many 'end of the world' legends and prophecies - a series of events that see the 'old world', cycle, yuga or epoch disappearing to be replaced by a new one.

In the Book of Revelation these events are symbolised as 'seals' while the Hopi prophecies call them 'signs'. Zulu legends and prophecies have the same themes and they are remarkably consistent with each other in many ways.

I stress that the 'end of the world' doesn't mean the end of life, only the end of an epoch, an age, and that is what we are experiencing now with many serious challenges to come. But if the old 'world' does not break down, the new cannot emerge because the old, through its Control System, will seek to stifle and suffocate that change.

So it has to go and it is in the process of doing so. How current events in the Gulf of Mexico fit into that we can only wait and see, but I am sure we are witnessing something of potentially enormous significance on so many levels.






source: http://www.davidicke.com


Vrh
 Profil  
 
Prikaži postove “stare”:  Redanje  
Započni novu temu Odgovori  [ 90 post(ov)a ]  Stranica Prethodna  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Sljedeća

Vremenska zona: UTC + 01:00


Online

Trenutno korisnika/ca: / i 2 gostiju.


Powered by phpBB © 2010 phpBB Group
BH (BIH) by Šehić Nijaz